The Young and the Fearless

It seems that the more our sport progresses, the younger our prodigies get. 10 year olds are climbing v13 and redpointing 5.14a while 11 year olds jug up El Capitan and redpoint 5.14c. The pool of strong young climbers continues to grow, making it difficult for up-and-comers to stand out.

But when a 19 year old climbs something like Too Big to Flail, it's hard to ignore his age. Too Big to Flail gets a v10 grade (or 5.13d depending on who you ask), which by todays standards is a pretty standard grade. It just happens to be a v10 that is 50 feet high, with precarious feet and slick, small handholds, some of which are very far apart. This means that a climber must not only be physically strong and technically proficient, but also mentally collected and immensely courageous. Located on the Luminance boulder in the Buttermilks, Too Big to Flail has captivated boulderers across the globe with its aesthetic patina and gargantuan size since its first ascent by renowned soloist Alex Honnold in January 2012. Its second ascent was seen by Lonnie Kauk, a climber who has begun to make quite an impression himself in the last few years within the soloing community. Both Honnold and Kauk acknowledged the intimidating and precarious nature of the line.

19 year old Steven Roth, a mechanical engineering student at UC Berkeley, is a recent addition to the Touchstone Climbing athlete team but is otherwise unsponsored and largely unheard of. Largely unheard of, even though he has made ascents, as well as established some of his own lines, of some of Bishops most stout highballs, such as Ambrosia and Footprints. Steven was born in Richmond, Virginia and went to high school in Florida before coming to the Bay Area to go to college. He made the third ascent of Alex Honnold's 50 foot monster-highball Too Big to Flail (v10) on February 9th, alongside Bay Area native and veteran climber Ethan Pringle, who nabbed the fourth ascent shortly after. I was able to ask Steven a few questions last week via email about his impressive send and what he has his eyes on next.



How long did it take you to project Too Big? Had you scoped out the climb before? Tell us about your send experience.

I spent two days at Too Big to Flail. On the first day of the weekend, Ethan and I headed out to the Luminance boulder to check out the climb. After the top rope was set up, Ethan lowered me as I brushed the holds, cleaned off some of the lichen, and started to unlock some of the harder moves. Thirty minutes later I had more or less done all of the moves and it was Ethan’s turn. He did the moves as well but was unsure about the smeary feet. It was getting dark but I managed to send the problem on top rope before it was too dark to see. After a good night's sleep I headed out early the next morning  to This Side of Paradise to check it out. The wind was insane! I was getting up to the higher moves but the pads were getting blown everywhere, and the gusts were pushing me off the climb. It was chaotic. The howling wind made it really hard to stand, let alone climb. We decided to meet up with Ethan and Georgie and go out to Too Big. It was much calmer but the weather was warm, a little too warm for any serious send burns. Tim Steele met us out there and we hiked a little less than 20 pads up the hill. At first I was a bit anxious to have more than a couple of people watching me climb but everyone was mellow so that was refreshing. Ethan and I were back at working the climb, this time in the heat. Ethan had "greasy sausage fingers" (his words), and my skin was thin, so climbing in the middle of the day was not ideal. But we got the moves really worked out and sent the climb on TR a couple of times using pretty different beta for the lower hard moves and the upper insecure moves. Ethan was able to figure out really long reaches at the very top while I had to use a couple of small holds that Alex and Lonnie used. It was getting cooler; the dark clouds were rolling in and completely covering Mt. Tom. After my third time sending on TR Ethan lowered me, and I said I was ready. We shuffled some pads, I put on my Solutions and within a couple of minutes I was standing on top. While I was climbing the wind was pretty strong and it sprinkled a little but the conditions were perfect. I was super excited and having Ethan's support was great! He seemed uncertain but after one last TR burn and a warm-up jog he cruised it too!

Steven Roth on To Big To Flail. Photo by Anthony Lapomardo.

Lonnie Kauk called it "next level". Was it intimidating to have solo legends like Honnold and Kauk as the first and second ascensionists?

Knowing that Alex and Lonnie, two greats in technical climbing, had done this climb didn't affect me too much since I really love vertical to slightly less than vertical climbing. It feels amazing to be comfortable on tiny feet, trusting the rubber, without a worry of pumping out.

Photo by Jessica Wan. 

How do you know Ethan? What was it like to work such a heady problem with someone else?

Ethan is an athlete for Touchstone Climbing where I work so I met him at the gym where I work with his girlfriend Georgie.  I’ve never worked a highball with someone else before this, but I don’t think it’s any different than working a normal boulder problem with someone.  It was nice to work out the moves with Ethan but for the crux sections we both ended up climbing them quite differently since he’s a bit taller than me.  Compared to being alone for hours like when I was working Ambrosia, climbing with a friend was more rewarding because I got to see his success as well.

Did you come to Bishop with Too Big in mind? Did you train specifically for it?

I didn’t go to Bishop specifically for Too Big, Ethan and I were just excited to go climb some highballs, but Too Big was certainly something we were planning on checking out.  I didn’t train for it; I’d actually say that it served as good training for a project I recently bolted here at a local coastal crag.  As far as the expectations to climb Too Big, I try not to have any expectations when working on a highball because I don’t like the pressure.  But after working it on a rope I was confident that I could do it.

Roth on "Rise"--a Shawn Diamond v9/10 on the southwest arete of the Luminance boulder. "I was able to figure out a wild, over the head drop knee for the crux move. I've never encountered a move like that in Bishop. The movement is brilliant and the rock quality is great." Anthony Lapomardo photo.

You've also completed Footprints and Ambrosia--that makes three ascents of arguably some of the most famous highballs in Bishop right now. What gets you psyched on highballs? Would you say that highballs are your passion in climbing?

I think that highballs are the most aesthetically pleasing lines to climb. They’re kind of like giant sculptures.  Too Big and Ambrosia are by far the most impressive boulder problems I’ve ever seen.  When I’m bouldering, highballs are indeed my passion, but I’ve also been zealous about bolting new routes lately.  Highballs and putting up tall first ascents is awesome but those climbs aren’t accessible to most of the climbing community.  Despite this, I have recently put up a new line on the Grandpa Peabody boulder and a stunning arête highball (The Air Up There, see picture) in the Pollen Grains. I’ve also been passionate about bolting routes since it’s so rewarding to have someone else come up to me and say they loved my route.

Roth on the first ascent of The Air Up There (Pollen Grains). "It's got some small crimps and committing heel hooking high off the ground", he said. Roth gave it a V7/8 grade, although he claims he's "not too good at grading things". Photo by Anthony Lapomardo.

How much time have you spent climbing in Bishop? Do you have other projects in Bishop you'd like to come back to?

I’ve only been to Bishop four times so far, but I plan on spending a lot more time there ticking all of the other highballs.  Ethan got me psyched on The Beautiful And Damned which I’d really like to suss out despite the fact that some pretty key holds just recently broke off, so it might not even be possible anymore. 

Do you have any before-climb rituals or mental preparation you find helpful before trying something tall and potentially dangerous? What sorts of things psyche you out? What do you do to quell the fear? How do you prepare mentally for a big-risk climb like Too Big to Flail?

Well when I’m sussing out the route on a rope I try to work everything out to the point that I’m totally confident I could do it even without any pads.  That way there’s no doubt in my mind, and I treat it like a free solo.  It’s weird; I feel more in control without a rope.  I don’t have any pre-climb rituals or anything.  I definitely feel the pressure when a bunch of people are watching or it’s a big deal to get all the pads together (which is why the solo mentality is convenient).  As soon as I know that I can do it without a rope I don’t think about when I’m going to do it, I just put my shoes on and start climbing, regardless of whether or not anyone else is ready.  That way I don’t psych myself out.

Thanks for taking the time to talk to us, Steven. Best of luck to you, and congratulations on the new sponsorship. Bishop looks forward to seeing you again!

Words and interview by Sasha Turrentine.

For more Anthony Lapomardo photos, see the latest DPM article here: http://bit.ly/1cJGbqk

Whiskey Creek Closed...But Maybe Not For Good?

It’s your first day in the Buttermilks, and the sun is setting. You’d like to keep climbing, but it feels like you’ve been in a slapping match with a cheese grater. You look at your fellow pebble gropers and say, “Whiskey Creek?”

Happy Hour at Whiskey Creek is an integral part of a bouldering trip to Bishop. Making it back into town by 6 o’clock can be a challenge, but if anything will motivate you to stop flailing on your project, it’s a $3 pint of Double Nut Brown.

Whiskey Creek owner Greg Alexander held a meeting on Friday, January 24 to tell his employees, some of whom have worked for him for almost 20 years, that Whiskey Creek was shutting down.

Whiskey Creek wasn’t just a favorite among cantaloupe-forearmed dirtbags—it was a popular destination among locals, tourists and families alike. A popular watering hole in the 80s, founder Sam Walker sold both Mammoth and Bishop locations to Greg Alexander in 1999, and it was Alexander who created the beloved Happy Hour (Half off more than half the menu! Cheap beer!), and the climbers have been flocking ever since.

“Everyone was crying”, said Debbie Nelsen, long-time server at Bishop Whiskey Creek. “We didn’t know [it was happening] until the day it closed. I knew things weren’t going well in Mammoth, but Bishop was a good money-maker. Nobody could believe it.”

So why did such a popular and well-loved restaurant have to close down?

“It really was a David-Goliath kind of story”, explained Alexander.

Seven years ago, Alexander sold the Mammoth location to a development group in hopes that he could free up money to buy another piece of property. Then the real estate crash happened and businesses across Mammoth starting going bankrupt, including the development group Alexander sold the property to. Instead of turning the property back over to the bank, the development group decided to sue him instead in attempt to get him out of the lease.

It turned into a 14-month court battle, which Alexander eventually lost on a technicality. He spent over $150,000 in lawyer fees and they upped his rent, putting it into “catastrophic terms”.  Throw in a stagnant economy and top it with the driest year on record (2013),  and you’ve got “a really crunched situation”, said Alexander plainly.

“If I could have just closed down Mammoth, I would have, but with a C corporation, you can’t just separate or close one down…they’re tied at the hip. It’s like one big company. I had no choice but to close both locations.”

There were over 100 people employed between Mammoth and Bishop, all of whom are now out of work. Tony Bouchereau, another longtime employee of Alexander’s, worked a combined 20 years between the Mammoth and Bishop locations. “I’m really not sure what I’ll do now”, he said.

Bouchereau didn’t hear of the closing until the night before it happened. He was enjoying dinner with his wife and was about to step into the movie theatre when the general manager called. He turned to his wife, in shock, unsure of whether or not they should continue the date or go home.

Waitress Debbie Nelsen got a call that her daughter was in labor a week after the restaurant closed, and bought a ticket immediately to San Diego to be with her.  “Right now I’m trying to do things I wasn’t able to do before”, she explained.

Nelsen described Whiskey Creek as a second family. She also put in almost 20 years at the restaurant and was able to raise two kids solely off her income as a daytime waitress. She is hopeful that this is not the end of Whiskey Creek.

“I’m not done with Whiskey Creek yet”, she laughed.

Alexander is currently trying to reopen Whiskey Creek in Bishop. He said there’s a lot of red tape to get past, but he’s working at opening a new location. So with any luck, it won't be a final farewell to the warm and crowded nights around $3 pints and food we dirtbags can actually afford.

Posted by Sasha Turrentine

Send any questions to sasha.turrentine@gmail.com

Tough link-up by Jacob Padilla

I always thought that Cocktail Sauce(v10) on the Smooth Shrimp boulder, (Buttermilks Main Area, just uphill from Mandala) was a pretty stout problem in itself, but for those who like to up the level a little, how about traversing into it all the way from the left?

Jacob Padilla, a coach and route-setter for City Beach Rock Club, Fremont, wrote to me about this link-up, which he just completed, describing it as, "The ultimate butt-dragger!"

Here he is cruising it ... Nice climbing, Jacob!

Desert Stormer ... v1 ... Really?

So a couple weeks ago a friend here brought to my attention a "v1" in my guidebook that he could find "no holds" on. Page 320 of the 2nd Edition of Bishop Bouldering lists the problem Desert Stormer as problem #16, with the photo-diagram at bottom right on page 321. The problem is on the back side of the Secrets of the Beehive boulder. I listed the grade as "v1?" The question mark is there in the guide with the comment "Reportedly about v1, but it looks harder." My guess is that I found the problem listed in an old topo from Mick Ryan, but didn't climb it before my guide went to print so left the grade nebulous.

Well, curiosity got the better of us, so we arranged some pads under the line to give it a go ... It was a bit dirty at first and took a little cleaning, but after a couple forays and drops onto the pads, several of us climbed the wall, finding it to have some fun technical face climbing. The top remains a bit crusty and caution is needed in manteling over. You'll need three or four pads and a good spot on this, as the landing isn't the best.

We figured it goes around v4/5-ish, so check it out and see what you think! This may not be the original Desert Stormer, or perhaps v1 used to be a lot harder. Take care on the topout.

Lisa Bedient demonstrates some foot skills while climbing Desert Stormer -- Secrets of the Beehive Boulder.

Mirko Caballero Adds Sit to Seven Spanish Angels

A low start had been added to Seven Spanish Angels on the Get Carter Boulder by Charlie Barrett back in 2010, but a true sit remained. This week Mirko Caballero started a little to the right and managed to get it done:

Beautiful Gecko at Ice Caves Reclimbed

Well over a year ago now, some time in November 2011, a good sized hold at the right side of the Beef Cave at the Ice Caves, Sad Boulders, broke away to leave a smooth scar on the overhang where there once was a nice fingertip "jug."

The problem Beautiful Gecko immediately became a good bit harder. Previously, this hold had been the go-to starting point on the mid-level rail that leads left across the roof to form the line of Beautiful Gecko. It had also been useful for Aquatic Hitchhiker up the prow, and slightly more vitally, Windchill, up the face, but these two weren't so drastically affected as the former line, which may well have gone unclimbed since that break. Funny, because a couple other small pieces of the same rail had broken in the past, but this hold was solid. Never looked like it could go anywhere. Monolithic. Like rock, I mean, like a rock.

Anyway, this Wednesday, Ian Cotter-Brown completed the powerful new sequence of tricky cross-overs and tenuous heel- and toe-hook maneuvers across this line. After the awkward, high-tension set-up, a tough stab into the rail of Beefcake with a harrowing swing led to the relative ease of the exit. The line looks likely to hold its v12 grade quite comfortably now, or may even ... break it?



A short while ago Ian also added the link-up of Windchill into the end of Beefcake to produce Subzero, yet another astounding new line from the cave that just keeps on caving ... Oh yeah, and giving. This last also checks in around the v12 range perhaps.

Atari, The Right Way?

Atari, as many will know, is one of the most iconic lines on The Tableland and many people head up the rocky slopes there on the east side of the Happy Boulders Canyon to get to grips with this classic frightener. Requiring hands on each side of a smoothly tapering tower of tuff, Atari provides a unique and tricky challenge.

Recently I heard from Jordan Shackleford about an interesting option on the Atari block--the right side of Atari. As you can see from the picture, it looks pretty spectacular, though I haven't been on it! Jordan climbed the line and wondered if it had been done before. If anyone knows, please post a comment below.

Above: Benoit Bourassa of Montreal on perhaps the second ascent of the right side of Atari. Thanks to Jordan Shackleford for the image

Jordan writes:

There is a long reach up with either hand to a big hold at the broken section of the face in the middle of the route. From there we cranked up with left hand and heel on the arete to gain that really good pocket on the Atari route, with left mono or finger stack in the hole. Then its a high step and a reach for the top.

According to Jordan, the line checks in at a mere v2--not that hard, but the landing is, as he says, "heinous." A fall would be a bad idea from anywhere but the start of the problem! Jordan was with a group of friends who also climbed the line following his lead. "A fun, easy line, but tread with caution," he concludes.